The US Department of Justice has not yet prosecuted or investigated anyone for covid-related crimes.
As Benjamin Bartee explains, in the USA, the statute of limitations for criminal conspiracy is five years, but the five-year limitation only begins once the conspiracy has concluded. The covid conspiracy continued well into 2023 and arguably beyond.
So, who should be investigated and prosecuted for wrongdoing?
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Elusive Covid Justice: Where Are the Prosecutions?
By Benjamin Bartee, 20 February 2026
A year and change into the Golden Age – a deep, and thus far unquenched, thirst for justice among a huge portion of the MAGA base notwithstanding – the administration has prosecuted precisely zero covid criminals.
What’s more, the Department of Justice, when Pam Bondi isn’t promising to prosecute Americans for “hate speech” or rolling out new schemes to cover up the Epstein, hasn’t scrounged up the time or energy to bother even investigating any of them.
No prosecutions, no investigations, no press releases. Nothing but radio silence.
The guy running USA’s Health and Human Services (“HHS”), RFK Jr. wrote a big, beautiful book elaborately detailing the rampant criminality of Fauci and many, many of his co-conspirators. And yet, nothing.
Rather, Attorney General Pam Bondi seems far more interested in prosecuting phantom “hate speech” crimes and covering up for the Epstein class.
Related: AG Pam Bondi Vows Federal Crackdown on ‘Hate Speech’
Were she inclined to do the job the base that put her in office would like her to do, however, she would have a plethora of legal implements at her disposal.
It is true that, for some federal crimes that these people likely committed – and we’re only discussing federal crimes, setting aside state-level statutes under which these people could be targeted – the statute of limitations has run its course and the window for prosecution has elapsed, being over six years out since the start of the pandemic and even longer from the pre-planning (the tabletop exercise ‘Event 201’ coincidentally timed in October 2019, just a few months before the lockdowns began, the illicit gain-of-function work on coronaviruses in offshore labs, etc.).
Criminal conspiracy – which these people provably engaged in – typically has a five-year statute of limitations. The key provision, though, is that the clock on the five-year statute of limitations window for criminal conspiracy only commences once the conspiracy has concluded.
As the conspiracy – the shot mandates, the forced masking, the business closures, etc. – arguably continued deep into 2023 and arguably even beyond, we’d still be well within the five-year window for prosecution.
Via Department of Justice (emphasis added):
Conspiracy is a continuing offence. For statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 371, which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986). For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).
An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986).
So, who should the Department of Justice be investigating, assuming it was serious about pursuing justice? A short but wildly incomplete list to start with:
- Anthony Fauci. The head of the snake. See: ‘Help Get This Simple Fauci Prosecution Playbook to Trump, Please’
- Peter Daszak. Former EcoHealth Alliance who acted as the conduit through which Fauci funnelled National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) funding to the Wuhan laboratory (after the Obama administration outlawed gain-of-function on American soil).
- Deborah Birx. The so-called “Scarf Lady” who ran the Trump White House response (into the ground).
- Peter Morens. Fauci’s capo at the NIAID, whom he used as a go-between to illegally skirt Freedom of Information Act record-keeping requirements. (Morens admitted as much in Congressional testimony, under oath).
- Francis Collins. Head of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) during and before covid.
- Rochelle Walensky. Head of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) during covid.
- Mandy Cohen. Walensky’s replacement, caught on camera gleefully explaining how she arbitrarily enforced covid lockdowns on the public with no scientific basis. See: ‘Biden Pick for New CDC Director Laughs About Arbitrarily Enforcing Covid Lockdowns’
Entire books can, and in some cases have, been written about each of these seedy characters, whose depravity stretches far further back in time than covid; indeed, their lack of morals or decency was the qualifying features that catapulted them to the top of the “Public Health” apparatus in the first place.
None of these people, for the record, benefitted from the flurry of pardons issued by whoever was running the Biden autopen on his way out the door, with the exception of Anthony Fauci. And even Fauci’s pardon, if indeed it was signed via autopen as it appears to have been, is highly suspect.
All of which is to say: there is no excuse for the total lack of effort to punish these demons who perpetrated the greatest scam in world history and killed untold millions of people, and perhaps billions in the aggregate, in the process.
About the Author
Benjamin Bartee, author of ‘Broken English Teacher: Notes From Exile’, is an independent Bangkok-based American journalist. He publishes articles on two Substack pages: ‘Armageddon Prose’ and ‘Armageddon Safari’. You can follow Amageddon Prose on Twitter (now X) HERE. If you would like to support his work, you can donate HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, US News
A good start would be to drop the word conspiracy. For it allows the guilty to hide. And so spin some bullshit.
Others: Baric, Offit, Shah, Cuomo, Gates
No statue of limitations of conspiracy to commit murder is there?
You’d need to prosecute the US military, NATO, the WHO and the central banks. Good luck with that.
‘and so I guess Reimer Fuelmich will be kept in jail until the statute of limitations applies. What is the length of time in the UK and the EU? Anyone know?
Hi Ken Hughes, an AI summary states that there is no statute of limitations in the UK for criminal conspiracy. “This means that proceedings for conspiracy can be brought at any time, regardless of how long ago the agreement [to conspire] was made.” See https://search.brave.com/search?q=statute+of+limitations+for+criminal+conspiracy+in+the+UK&source=desktop&conversation=08c61d0678be8b9203a872b34c6c7c653262&summary=1
And an AI summary for the EU states “there is no comprehensive or unified EU-wide statute of limitations for criminal conspiracy … In the EU, criminal law is generally governed by individual member states, and statutes of limitations vary significantly across countries.” See https://search.brave.com/search?q=statute+of+limitations+for+criminal+conspiracy+in+the+EU&source=web&summary=1&conversation=08c669ecb36560c33a9517b74c2d6b02b975