Restore Britain has published a policy paper outlining the legal obstacles to and the practical logistics of deporting every illegal migrant in Britain. At this time, it is estimated that there are in the region of 2 million illegal immigrants in Britain.
Using a two-pronged approach of voluntary and enforced removals, “it would take exactly 3 years to deport all of the roughly 1.8 million illegals we believe to be living in our midst,” the paper states.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Restore Britain is a new political movement led by Rupert Lowe, Member of Parliament for Great Yarmouth. It describes itself as a grassroots effort aimed at reshaping how Britain is governed and has the foundational principles of “low tax, small state, slash immigration, protect British culture, restore Christian principles, carpet-bomb the cancer of wokery, fight lawfare, empower individual enterprise and plenty more.” On its “Join Us” page, Restore Britain adds free speech and direct democracy as core principles
“2029 is the ultimate objective, but that does not mean we cannot effect real and positive change in the next four years. If we don’t, there won’t be a Britain to restore,” Mr. Lowe says.
On 9 October, Restore Britain published its policy paper titled ‘Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics’, which sets out a blueprint for the removal of every person living in Britain illegally – combining sweeping legal reforms with a fully costed operational plan.
According to Restore Britain, the 113-page paper is the first of its kind to detail how the mass deportation of all illegal migrants could be achieved lawfully, logistically and efficiently within three years, likely faster.
It proposes a “Great Clarification Act” to reassert parliamentary sovereignty over the courts, the repeal of the Equality Act and Human Rights Act, withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights and the abolition of Britain’s asylum system in its current form.
Below, we have reproduced the Executive Summary from the paper.
Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics – Executive Summary
The British people are suffering. Much of that suffering has to do with an illegal immigration catastrophe that makes us poorer, less safe, and more despairing of our own institutions.
Restore Britain’s policy paper, Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics, sets out a comprehensive plan for detaining and deporting every single person who has broken illegally into our national home.
We propose to achieve this goal by mixing forced removals with subtler tactics for making residence in Britain unliveable for those with no right to be here. Part I deals with the legal obstacles to mass deportations, all of which must be cleared. Part II deals with the practical logistics of mass deportations. Neither is good enough without the other.
Part I: The Legal Obstacles to Mass Deportations
At Restore Britain, we note with alarm that our ability to defend our own borders against unarmed invasion confronts serious barriers in the form of domestic laws and international agreements. In Part I, we call for the removal of these obstacles as a prerequisite to restoring national sovereignty. We view such laws as manmade mechanisms that can and must be changed in the interests of the British people. Our proposals assume a government with the political will and the majority in Parliament to pass major reforms.
We start by giving a non-exhaustive but important list of domestic laws to be prioritised for repeal and/or amendment. Among the objectives of the changes we recommend are to relieve the state of any duty to support asylum seekers unless they cooperate with a ramped-up process of detention and eventual removal, the abolition of non-detention-related accommodation centres and time-consuming immigration tribunals, and an end to the Equality Act (2010).
We next address the United Nations Refugee Convention of 1951, which has been embedded in much of our domestic legislation. We call for the repeal of all references to its rules and principles, especially those allowing asylum claims after safe-country travel. We take the view that the Convention is unsuited to an era of mass migration on an unprecedented global scale. As far as our own law is concerned, we think that refugee status should only ever be extended to those arriving directly and seeking genuine asylum from countries that neighbour us. All other claims must be rejected as a matter of course. Given that every one of Britain’s immediate neighbours is presently classed as a safe country, this would effectively mean scrapping our whole asylum system. It has been abused for far too long. In the longer term, we push for a new worldwide status quo that would impose an obligation on self-described refugees to seek asylum in their home continent. This would reduce cultural conflicts and give world leaders a stronger incentive to support regional stability.
The European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act (1998) both have a well-known track record of blocking particular deportations, let alone mass deportations. They do so by handing down disruptive judgments, typically by appeal to preventing torture (Article 3) and safeguarding family life (Article 8). We consider the merits of full withdrawal from the ECHR/repeal of the HRA on the one hand and selective disobedience of rights-based rulings on the other. Ultimately, we conclude that withdrawal and repeal are for the best – despite the fact that such measures will give rise to political difficulties, though not a legal dead-end, in Northern Ireland relating to the Belfast Agreement.
While we acknowledge these concerns, we argue that withdrawal and repeal need not jeopardise peace on the Irish mainland, particularly given that we propose to retain in our law a minuscule fraction of select ECHR precedents that have direct relevance to Northern Ireland’s peculiar history. Any sliver of retained case law would have no reasonable bearing on immigration policy. It would be applied by British courts, maintaining social cohesion and legal continuity without doing anything to hinder deportation efforts.
In the event that any remaining laws continue to be abused to hinder such efforts, we have an ace up our sleeve: the Great Clarification Act. A groundbreaking Restore Britain proposal, our Great Clarification Act would reiterate Parliament’s full power to defeat troublesome court decisions in real time by a simple majority.
On the Windsor Framework and EU relations, we make the case that withdrawal from the ECHR and repeal of the HRA does nothing to breach the terms of our post-Brexit trading settlement with our European neighbours. However, we accept that the status of our UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement may face minor issues on non-trade provisions like criminal justice and continental data-sharing. In any case, these could already do with a lick of paint to address the special challenges of the 21st century. We call for imaginative new partnerships with the EU on border security and much else to replace the creaking edifice of outdated systems.
Last of all, we tackle judicial activism – a major block to national sovereignty and patriotic government. As we have seen, our Great Clarification Act would enable Parliament to correct misguided rulings through an exacting but clear process. Other reforms include stricter criteria for judicial review, removing biased judges, and restoring the Lord Chancellor’s role in appointments.
All of the above changes are essential if we wish to implement the practical logistics of mass deportations laid out in Part II.
Part II: The Practical Logistics of Mass Deportations
In Part II, we detail the actual steps that will have to be taken to achieve mass deportations. We run with the assumption that there are between 1.8-2 million foreigners living in Britain without permission. Any sensible government should want to make the removal of every single one of them as undramatic and cost-free as possible. There is no point in flexing our muscles for the sake of it while getting little in the way of practical dividends.
In view of this fact, our plan would involve a two-pronged approach of voluntary removals and enforced removals, each supporting and reinforcing the other.
Inspired in many ways by the second Trump administration, we call for a “hostile environment” to encourage self-deportations, combined with somewhere in the region of 150,000 to 200,000 forced deportations per year. Assuming a conservative ratio of three voluntary exits for every forced exit, together with a similarly conservative annual average of 150,000 forced deportations, it would take exactly 3 years to deport all of the roughly 1.8 million illegals we believe to be living in our midst. Our preferred realistic estimate, developed towards the end of Section VIII, puts the full length of mass deportations at an even more encouraging 2 years and 5 months.
We focus first on fostering a culture of voluntary returns. These cost less and scale better than forced deportations. E-visas should be made the only acceptable proof of legal residency for non-British citizens, with strict audits on gig economy platforms where illegal workers thrive. Right to Work checks should be expanded to contractors and the self-employed, particularly in sectors that are known to serve as illegal hotspots like construction and hospitality. Non-compliant employers must face heavy fines or jail. Future government contracts should also be handed out on the strict condition that private companies enlisted for their services can demonstrate compliance with the hostile environment. In relation to housing, we demand Right to Rent checks at tenancy start, with considerable penalties and potential asset seizure for landlords who fail to comply. We propose changing homelessness laws to exclude illegal immigrants, redirecting them to deportation.
In healthcare, we call for an end to so-called “safe surgeries” that shield illegal immigrants, requiring status proof for NHS access and upfront charges for non-emergency care. Data-sharing across public services should make a priority of tracking the illegal population.
In banking, we propose biometric checks for accounts and closing any without valid status. A remittance tax on countries that refuse to take back their own citizens should also be levied to raise deportation funds and pressure uncooperative governments. We also envision an app or portal offering reintegration aid, to be promoted through PR campaigns and embassy partnerships. Publicising enforcement and embedding support in community roles will boost compliance.
With respect to forced deportations, we propose expanding Immigration Enforcement with thousands of new staff, including veterans and police, funded by fines, seized assets, and higher visa fees for high-overstay countries. Data integration is critical: councils, NHS, and other agencies should be required by law to share information that assists in identifying illegal immigrants. Employers, landlords, and banks must report suspicious activity. A public reporting portal, together with rewards for successful whistleblowing, should be brought online to encourage help from the law-abiding people of Britain.
We call for a dramatic increase in detention capacity, using sites like former RAF bases to detain thousands awaiting deportation. Private firms should be enlisted to manage these facilities for maximal efficiency. For the deportations themselves, a combination of commercial flight seats, extra charter flights, and military transport should be employed, depending on the needs of the case at hand.
Crucially, we demand the retrospective revocation of anyone recently rewarded with asylum for illegal entry. Again to influence uncooperative countries, we advocate sanctions like visa bans, aid cuts, and tariffs, plus a NATO-like coalition of Western nations doing likewise to compound the diplomatic pressure on places like India, Nigeria, and Pakistan. Third-country processing deals, along the lines of past models, should be secured to ease coordination problems and boost capacity.
We expect all this to require expenditure in the tens of billions over five years, but savings from reduced public spending and revenue from fixed penalty notices and taxes on remittance payments will no doubt offset such costs.
Featured image taken from ‘Rupert Lowe Launches “Restore Britain”’, Caldron Pool, 1 July 2025
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
Restore Britain must form a pact with Reform. That is the only way this plan will actually happen.
At last! Someone with a real action plan, but why has this taken so long?
This is JUST a plan. The implementation of this plan are far from execution. Many in govern-ment will oppose the plan.
The parliament of UK seats already taken by “former-illegal-migrant-family” and the rest of their families (whole settlement) are still-illegal migrant and waiting to get PR.
There will be huge mass protest. Planned to stir chaos & unrest to divert the real problems from to be solved.
Once the migrants enters, they will never want to leave because they already leave behind ALL what they owned from previous country. They have nothing if returned. Thus, becoming alienated at own country.
Illegal immigrants don’t arrive with much, particularly not the Channel Boat People. I don’t see the dinghies loaded with possessions, do you? Nothing but the clothes on their backs to a few suitcases is all immigrants can carry. Where are they going to get two or three thousand pounds to ship stuff from their impoverished countries to the UK? I am English and I have moved to live in five countries on four continents where my contracts were for between two and four years. In every case, I arrived with two pieces of roller luggage and a carry on..
Upon arrival, I stayed in an hotel for a couple of weeks whilst looking for a place to rent. It was only after I had moved into the completely empty rental accommodation that I began to purchase items for it. When I left at the end of the contract, I sols some of the things and gave away others.
It’s easy to do.
Besides, if the illegals lose their possessions, so what? It’s simply part of the punishment for breaking the law. Too bad. They should have considered what might happen to them if they were caught. Their lack of foresight is their fault.
Deport them! Kick them out of our country and send them back to theirs. And make sure that the world knows they are being deported because it will help to deter future would-be invaders.
Most Illegal Immigrant run away from a conflicted country (such as war). They only could bring along necessities and some valuable items because this is not a tourist boat could bring luggage. The reality is, the boat was packed with other people like a sardine in can.
I do agree kick them back to where they came from but the main issues here are the UK Goverment themselves bring them in. They do not enter covertly but UK people’s extending “olive branch” for moral support.
Do you see the irony here..?!
Everybody on the street, on social media are cheering & supporting the gesture by government sheltering them but when asked to let these immigrants stay at their home, everybody gone silent.
WHAT A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITES..!!
Illegals seem to believe they are entitled to flood the West. I’d like to know if they arrived with that belief and, if so, who put it into their heads. I strongly suspect that the NGO’s that brought them actually recruited them in their home countries. They were supplied with food, clothing and shelter along their way, and probably promises of easily seizing parts of our countries for themselves, too.
Who designed all this? Who are the willing saboteurs who have made it all happen? While we are deporting all the immigrants, we must also be ferreting out and punishing the citizens who did this to our countries. There will be thousands of collaborators in what used to be respectable and dependable positions who must be made to pay for the vast damage they’ve done and prevented from ever doing more.
Bingo!
You’re correct. All are carefully planned by an insider..
NGOs & Government are involved directly in this. Soon, parliament will allocate a sum of budget money for the operation to send those immigrant back.
The reality, this is a crafty and sneaky co-operations to syphoned the budget money into pockets of corrupt politicians.
The same method was done with Ukraine budget allocations. Half of the money was missing ended up in both USA politicians & Zelensky.
https://stopworldcontrol.com/unitednations/
Why on earth aren’t the authorities stopping them coming in the first place. A hell of a lot easier and cheaper keeping them out rather than trying to remove them. Feels like a deliberate policy to Islamise the country until the once majority revolts and we have civil unrest so they can impose Martial Law..
yes, there should be part 0- don´t let them in,
check out and read carefully a petition on the uk government and parliament petition page…..dissolve parliament and call a general election now….it can and must be signed and reshared widely from all over the uk
who are you going to vote for ? that is our demise “ voting “ Paton said it best “ it’s a racket “
Yes, like having to choose between Trump and Kackling Kamala when you know they both represent the same uni-party. I sometimes wonder how Maggie Thatcher would have dealt with the current political mess in the UK.
The only vote we should make is to spoil the ballot paper by drawing a line across it and writing “none of them” on it. If enough of us did that, we might get something better out of the ashes. Government needs to be returned to local level, by and for local people. The present uniparty system is rotten to the core and needs binned. As someone once said, if voting meant anything, we wouldn’t be allowed to do it.
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/qIpKx5vSTaA feeding the homeless
About time! How much longer do British girls have to be raped, gang raped, or prostituted ?
💥THE RAPE OF BRITAIN: Over 250,000 British girls raped by Muslim men
Clean-up the the whole Europe too!
Muslim Gang-Rape Marathons Continue Across Europe: Where’s the Press? | Rollitup
The sooner the better. Make it happen PDQ! Then start repairing the fabric of society that’s been torn and shredded by the imbeciles and traitors that ushered them in, and get rid of them too, by firing squad or exile. No More Muslims in positions of “authority” in the British Commonwealth of Nations. They are harbingers of disaster. I said this 25 years ago when the invasion into Canada first started.
[…] Restore Britain publishes a plan for removing 2 million illegal migrants from the UK Restore Britain has published a policy paper outlining the legal obstacles to and the practical logistics of deporting every illegal migrant in Britain. At this time, it is estimated that there are in the region of 2 million illegal immigrants in Britain. Using a two-pronged approach of voluntary and enforced removals, “it would take exactly 3 years to deport all of the roughly 1.8 million illegals we believe to be living in our midst,” the paper states. […]
What might help this along would be a people’s proclamation basically saying that those that have signed it categorically disapprove of the government apparatus that have allowed this to happen and all those responsible will be held financially liable with loss of pension and property with long term prison sentences where appropriate, and any member of the public that do not sign will be liable for additional taxation when common sense prevails
No time like the present, START now, Islam is incompatible with any civilized society, just look around to see the evidence, Australia, Lebanon, Gaza, Italy, Germany, France, need I go on!!!!
Thank God there are some real patriots in Britain who are working hard against all odds to restore the almost-lost nation.
Ive been seeing people slagging ECHR laws from all political spectrum , theres one tiny detail I would like to point out. All these new weaponized traffic cameras popping out all over UK, along with digitalization of sociaty, ECHR is the only law that stops it from being “legally” used on citizens without consent, Freedom of Privacy ( Article 8 i think). So they already built a digital prison, Left is already breaking the law by using it without consent, “right” gets in and scraps ECHR, under the disguise of stopping illigals, and booooom , we all going to wake up with hands in our own pisspots. No matter how good they sound, no matter which side they supposed to represent, the outcome will always be the same, globalistic agenda. The fact no one talks about these weapons deployed on out commuting infrastructure is just beyond anyones mind.Those illigals r serving purpose here, convincing population to give their rights awaya so they can be switched on to digital prison is just one of many reasons. Dont trust any of them, as far as I could toss a midget 🙂