Dr. Malcolm Kendrick explains why people have concluded that covid was a plandemic. It’s because people’s trust in authorities was broken due to the many lies and misinformation spread by the government and selected “experts” during the covid pandemic, he says.
“When people despair of so-called ‘conspiracy theories, or theorists, and why do they seem to be taking over the world.’ I say: You caused it, and your actions and denials of facts just make it worse. Do you think people don’t notice when you talk utter unscientific bollocks, or threaten to throw people in jail, or remove their license to practice medicine for stating verifiable facts? Actions have consequences,” he writes. Now “a large number of people don’t believe anything you have to say.”
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Why Do So Many Believe Covid Was a Plandemic?
By Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, 22 March 2025
This is primarily a matter of trust – and the lack of it.
If it looks like a conspiracy, and quacks like a conspiracy … or, to change focus slightly to Covid. If it looks like 1984, and quacks like 1984 – it’s probably 1984. What happened with Covid I found extraordinary and scary. Within a very short time, longstanding individual rights and freedoms which people fought and died for, over hundreds of years, had gone.
At the very start of the pandemic, I remember driving to work along deserted roads with no traffic at all. Which was actually rather nice. At one point, the only vehicles I recall seeing were police cars with policemen in the front, brooding, watching. Not quite the thought police, but you know, scary.
I was never pulled over. Perhaps they checked my registration plate, looked up owner details, and found out that I was Dr Malcolm Kendrick, tootling about to save patients. Perhaps not, I have no idea, I never stopped to ask.
As a natural-born rebel, I decided I would go out walking in the nearby countryside – when we were not allowed to. I was uncomfortably aware of being observed as I walked past farms in the Peak District, net curtains twitching? Maybe that was just my fevered imagination. Car parks in the middle of nowhere were closed off using “Police Do Not Enter” tape. The type they use for crime scenes.
My local golf club was closed. No one could play. You could walk across the golf course with friends and family, as many did, but swinging a golf club obviously stirred up the atmosphere, attracting the Covid virus towards you. Like midges in Scotland, or something.
Then there were the fact-checkers who sprang up out of nowhere. These titans who we suddenly found walking among us, bestriding the world like intellectual colossus(es)/colossi knowing that they, and only they, could determine what constitutes a fact.
They regularly stomped on anyone who dared raise their head above the parapet. Suggest, for example, that Ivermectin may actually have some benefit in Sars-Cov2, and watch the empurpled rage descend, along with the mockery.
Ahead of full US authorisation of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had a simple message for Americans contemplating using ivermectin, a medicine used to deworm livestock, instead of getting a covid shot.
“You are not a horse,” it said. “You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
‘You are not a horse’: FDA tells Americans stop taking dewormer for Covid, The Guardian, 23 August 2021
Well, thanks for the explanation that humans are not horses, or cows, with all the implied mockery that the public is so easily led and plain stupid. You know, many of us had been looking at the anti-viral properties of Ivermectin for a long time. When Sars-Cov2 came along it appeared promising – even in people, who are not cows. Who knew.
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans.
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro – PubMed
Those of us, who actually look at research, find comments such as “Seriously, y’all. Stop it”to be just a teensy-weensy bit on the patronising side. It was a phrase almost certainly created by someone who hasn’t a clue about medicine or science. “Aspirin was created to reduce pain and temperature, not to reduce the risk of heart disease. Seriously y’all, trying to use it in heart disease, just stop it y’all”
On a more serious note, I was threatened by the General Medical Council on a couple of occasions for criticising the lack of safety research on the new vaccines. There were widespread attacks going on, all over the place, to silence anyone questioning the official narrative.
Lord Sumption, once head of the Supreme Court in England, had this to say about it all:
The sheer scale on which the government has sought to govern by decree, creating new criminal offences, sometimes several times a week on the mere say-so of ministers, is in constitutional terms truly breathtaking.”
This is how freedom dies. When societies lose their liberty, it is not usually because some despot has crushed it under his boot. It is because people voluntarily surrendered their liberty out of fear of some external threat.
Sweden, alone amongst European countries, decided not to lockdown, or perhaps you could call what they did lockdown “lite.” Schools, restaurants and bars remained open. People travelled on public transport. This approach was universally condemned. It was said that Dr Anders Tegnell (chief epidemiologist) and Stefan Löfven (the prime minister), were …
“…playing Russian roulette with the Swedish population,” Carlsson said. “At least if we’re going to do this as a people … lay the facts on the table so that we understand the reasons. The way I am feeling now is that we are being herded like a flock of sheep towards disaster…
“… Leading experts last week were fiercely critical of the Swedish public health authority in an email thread seen by state broadcaster SVT, accusing it of incompetence and lack of medical expertise.”
I went to speak at an anti-lockdown rally in Edinburgh in September 2020. It had been approved by the police. However, the organiser was dragged in for questioning and was told he could face up to five years in jail for endangering public health. Five years in prison… It did feel as if some totalitarian regime had taken over. It most certainly felt as though Big Brother was watching you, everywhere.
Although, from what I could see, most people seemed to welcome this with open arms. The State stepping in to take control and keep us all safe. Fellow doctors were very much of the “we should lock down harder, and longer and silence anyone who objects” brigade. And, by the way, make vaccination mandatory, for everyone.
I have always been more of a “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty, nor safety.” Kind of a guy. Which appears to place me very firmly in the minority in the UK, and most of the Western World. And most certainly a minority of one within the medical profession. At least, it felt that way.
I found that, taken as a whole, the actions taken had the feel of “they,” whoever they may be, coming together to form some great all-powerful Oligarchy to rule us all. The great and the good gathering power around themselves. The WHO, the World Economic Forum, prime ministers and presidents, billionaires such as Bill Gates.
Of course, all of them fervently deny the “grabbing power” thing. “We were doing it for you own good, can’t you see?” Yes, the defence of coercive controllers since time immemorial. Democracy was suspended – perhaps indefinitely – and at times, “they” seemed to be getting a taste for it. The thin veneer of Western Liberal democracy stripped away to reveal what lies underneath. Usually, not nice.
So, I can see exactly why it all had the look and feel of some great worldwide conspiracy. And once you start to view the Covid pandemic through the conspiracy lens, all actions can seem sinister.
Bill Gates was trying to inject nanotechnology into us with the vaccines. 5G masts had been set up to control us all and activate the virus (I’m not sure I remember that right). Vaccines were designed to kill people and reduce the human population. The World Economic Forum was going to turn us into powerless economic units: “You will own nothing and be happy.’’
All nonsense those involved cry. True, I reply. Because I don’t believe there was a great conspiracy. Nothing could be that well planned or organised. People are generally pretty useless at such things.
Instead, I believe that the motivations behind (most) of those in charge were benign, if paternalistic. “They” did not wish to defenestrate democracy around the world and transfer power to themselves. What we had was more of a: “We, the mighty leaders, are here to look after you. Only we know the great and complex plan. You, on the other hand, the lumpen proletariat, cannot be trusted to make the correct decisions, so do as we say.”
In essence, “they” will tell you what to do and what to think about the entire pandemic. This form of parent/child social interaction was best described by Eric Berne in his seminal book ‘Games People Play’. The theory of transactional analysis.
Here is a good description of this dynamic and the situation that can develop (in this case, within a company):
Whenever a paternalistic leadership style is enacted, an asymmetry is established. The leader (or superior of some sort) exhibits behaviour that resembles a parent while the subordinate exhibits behaviour that resembles a child.
There is an entirely different interaction between the members of a leadership team. The ‘Parents’ (leaders) engage in truthful esoteric conversations with each other, discussions that are designed for them alone. They then pass down a filtered subset of exoteric knowledge, only that which is deemed suitable for ‘Children’s’ (subordinate’s) consumption.
Thus, paternal leadership becomes a form of domination: it imposes the ‘Parent’s’ rationality upon the ‘Children’. The ‘Children’ are excluded from participating in the ‘Parent’s’ world. In this dynamic, both ‘Children’ and ‘Parents’ avoid Adult-to-Adult conversation. Paternalistic leaders effectively create a chasm between themselves and their infantilised employees. The employees are relegated to a ‘nursery’ where they can be seen but not heard.
Dialogue over Paternalism, John Dobbin, 22 August 2021
Sound familiar in any way?
I always find it ironic that, as a doctor, I was taught about transactional analysis at medical school and warned to avoid a paternalistic approach. In retrospect, I think I must have remembered that wrong. “You will take on a paternalistic approach.”
But I diverge. The point I want to make here is that when you treat people like children, you can expect two results. One, people take shelter behind the parent figure, trusting in everything they are told, which is the result the authorities are hoping for. Two, people get angry and fight back. The truculent child.
I usually take on the truculent child position when people try to tell me what to do. Arms crossed, grumpy face. I always prefer adult/adult conversations, but this is often tricky when “experts” propound their truth, and “facts,” and will brook no dissent. “Do you not know who I am? I am an expert in [insert expertise here], and you are but a General Practitioner. You know nothing.”
The truculent child certainly takes over when it becomes clear that a great deal of what we are being told is nonsense. Or, as close to nonsense as makes no difference. The virus is spread through droplets, not aerosols. This was clearly nonsense from day one. Look up ferrets.
Or try this one. You can take masks off whilst eating in a restaurant, but you have to put them back on when standing up and walking in a restaurant. Take me through the evidence behind this again, slowly? I promise not to laugh this time. Cross my heart and hope to die.
At the very beginning, staff in hospitals and nursing homes were told that they could not wear masks or personal protective equipment (“PPE”) as it might upset the patients. Oh, yes, we remember that, or at least I certainly do. Then, once there actually were masks, and PPE, we were told we had to wear them, for our safety, and the protection of patients. Four legs good, two legs bad became …
The first masks I received had a little sticker on them to inform me that they were in date until 2022. When I peeled back the, rather crudely applied, sticker, it revealed something else beneath. Information stating that the masks had gone out of date in 2017. Yes, we were sent out-of-date equipment. Which had been deliberately disguised to look as if it was still in date.
Personally, I wasn’t that bothered about the risk of out-of-date masks. I didn’t think the PPE we were given had the slightest effect, on anything. Certainly not surgical masks. The air comes in the side and goes out the side. As far I was concerned, all that masks would ever achieve was to turn droplets into aerosols as you breathed in and out. Thus, increasing infection risk.
However, the sheer duplicity of changing the use-by dates on, supposedly, lifesaving equipment was outrageous. If they could do that … what else?
Oh, you don’t remember them doing this. Well, I bloody do. And as you can see, I took photographs just to remind me that I hadn’t been hallucinating. Because, to believe they actually did this means you will end up at the following place with your thinking:
Someone, somewhere, made the decision to provide health care staff with out-of-date equipment.
At which point, they had to pay someone else, somewhere, to print out millions of little stickers with a new, false, date printed on them.
Then, a small army of workers had to be paid to take the boxes containing masks out of their cartons and place new stickers over the old “use by” date. Then, put the boxes back in the cartons. Then, send them out.
This wasn’t some “oops, how careless, silly little me,” mistake. Meetings will have been organised, at which senior managers got together and agreed the workload, timings, and costs. And someone, somewhere, signed all of this off.
Then I took a photograph to remind me of the utter, utter, bast …
“Now, you expect me to believe everything you say?”
But this was just a little thing, you may say. No, it was not a little thing. It was a symptom of something very big and malignant underneath. Clear evidence that those in charge were willing to lie through their teeth – to staff who were working on the front line. Happily exposing them to an increased risk of death by sending out faulty equipment – and then quite deliberately hiding that fact.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
“Oh yes, we admit we lied about this. But as for everything else. We told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help me …” Stop, just don’t say that last bit. A bolt of lightning may strike you down. And I may stand cheering on the sidelines. Of course, there was much more, so much more. Things we were told that were utter scientific bollocks, or direct misinformation, or just plain lies, with heavy handed threats to those who tried to point it out.
Just to give one more example. I wrote a blog suggesting that mRNA vaccines may increase the risk of myocarditis (inflammation and damage to the heart), and I got a threatening phone call from NHS England to tell me to cease and desist, or else.
Another doctor contacted me about the same issue. I discussed this on my blog:
My last blog discussed the possibility that mRNA covid-19 vaccines significantly increase the risk of myocarditis. Following this, a fellow doctor reached out to tell me about what has happened to them. They too, had questioned some aspects of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines.
As a result, they have been sent two threatening letters, which are both of the “iron fist in a velvet glove” variety. I asked their permission to reproduce them here. One is from the General Medical Council (GMC). The other from their responsible officer – I shall explain what this title means a bit further on.
Below is the letter from the GMC:
Dear Dr….
The GMC have received several complaints regarding your recent social media posts.
All doctors have a right to express their personal opinion regarding the Covid-19 vaccine, and while the GMC in no way supports this opinion, we don’t consider your comments are sufficiently strong to open a fitness to practice investigation at this stage.
However, we are referring this matter to your Responsible Office for your reflection through the appraisal process.
We ask that you consider what implications this complaint might have for your practice when you are discussing this with your appraiser. We would also like to remind you of GMC guidance, in particular Doctors’ use of social media, and of the requirement of doctors to act with honesty and integrity to justify the public’s trust in them.
What we will do now
We will share the complaint with your responsible officer for them to consider in the wider context of your practice and revalidation.
Vaccination – silencing doctors in the UK, Dr. Malcom Kendrick, 27 February 2022
What a creepy, creepy, creepy letter. The GMC was sharing the complaint with the responsible officer (“RO”). This is, essentially, a very thinly veiled threat that if you don’t shut up, the RO will remove you from the medical register. This means that you cannot work as a doctor in the UK or anywhere else in the world. Potentially, forever.
It is now widely accepted that mRNA vaccines do increase the risk of myocarditis. So, we were both right. And we were both threatened with the removal of our licences to practice medicine. Lies and threats, threats and lies.
Now, to return to the question I posed as the title to this blog. “Why do so many people continue to believe Covid was a “plandemic”? It is because, dear reader, and dear “expert,” and dear – all those carrying out the deliberately designed to be pointless UK Covid enquiry. We were quite clearly lied to, many times.
In addition, those raising medical concerns, e.g. myocarditis, were squashed, with additional intimidation thrown in. People organising legal demonstrations against lockdown were threatened with, in one case, five years in jail.
Trust. Takes a lifetime to build, seconds to break.
You broke it.
No wonder a large number of people don’t believe anything you have to say. Now, we have many who claim there was no virus at all. The deaths were just made up, or caused by the very actions designed to save people … I don’t agree with this. But I can see why some people do.
When people despair of so-called “conspiracy theories, or theorists, and why do they seem to be taking over the world.” I say: You caused it, and your actions and denials of facts just make it worse. Do you think people don’t notice when you talk utter unscientific bollocks, or threaten to throw people in jail, or remove their license to practice medicine for stating verifiable facts? Actions have consequences. So, could you just stop it y’all.
And breathe.
Next. The cover-up.
About the Author
Dr. Malcom Kendrick is a Scottish GP. He publishes blogs on his website, Dr. Malcom Kendrick, to provide “some balance to the increasingly strident healthcare lobby that seems intent on scaring everyone about almost everything.” He is also the author of three books: ‘The Clot Thickens: the enduring mystery of heart disease’, ‘Doctoring Data: How to sort out medical advice from medical nonsense’ and ‘The Great Cholesterol Con: The truth about what really causes heart disease and how to avoid it’.
Featured image edited from ‘Key lessons of Covid are being forgotten,’ UK scientists warn’, The Guardian, 25 March 2025
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
used to be when govt and the courts didn’t give justice the public took justice in their own hands…. don’t think we are up to this any more…. we’ve been weakened thru decades of intense social engineering…. the millions killed and all people do is complain…. not enough group support to take any real action
Yes Frank, and to quote Ed Burrows: “A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.” The Uniparty governments of the UK do not act for us, and to quote from the Bible “if you are not for me, then you must be against me.” What part of treason does Joe Public not understand?
Oh dear this doctor is very naive. He doesn’t appear to know this was a co-ordinated, global plan to depopulate the world. What you call conspiracy theories are facts but you need to have done the research. This plan was put in place many years ago, the virus and the gene therapy shot were patented years before the plandemic and was a DOD initiative known as a countermeasure. The cabal are currently planning the next fake pandemic.
yes, a very interesting article which is somewhat disturbing in that it is trying to sell the idea that the harms were not planned and intentional – this is a classic text book example of controlled opposition – say the right things to get people on board and then very subtly start pushing the real agenda – i quote: “Because I don’t believe there was a great conspiracy. Nothing could be that well planned or organised. People are generally pretty useless at such things.
Instead, I believe that the motivations behind (most) of those in charge were benign, if paternalistic.” “They” did not wish to defenestrate democracy around the world and transfer power to themselves. What we had was more of a: “We, the mighty leaders, are here to look after you. Only we know the great and complex plan. You, on the other hand, the lumpen proletariat, cannot be trusted to make the correct decisions, so do as we say.”
You are quite right about there being a tactic of controlled opposition, but I don’t think it can be said about Dr. Kendrick.
He is a great truther on other topics beside the Plandemic, and has been for many years. As a truther, the Daily Mail made a very savage attack on him and it took a five-year legal battle to get them to print an apology.
You have cherry-picked a couple of sentences to make a false accusation against him and you have ignored a lot of what he said in order to misrepresent his article.
“somewhat disturbing in that it is trying to sell the idea that the harms were not planned and intentional” – he isn’t trying to “sell the idea”as you put it, he just expresses his opinion.
If you find this disturbing, then I can’t understand how you can trust any truther at all, because we all have our views and each will have slight variances in their views. One hundred per cent agreement on every point is rare if not impossible.
you know it was planned and organised but it it was badly executed .So it only achieved partly and some of it was deliberate failure .. The failure around loss of faith in doctors makes it easier for AI doctors to replace them and national govts are dead and it is easier for world govt to work . has been reasonably successful
You are completely wrong about him being controlled opposition. How many of his other articles have you read?
Had it been an author that I wasn’t familiar with, I would have become suspicious as you have, but I have read many of his articles, so I know a lot about him.
When I read it and came across those words dismissing it being planned I was disappointed, but I merely thought, “He’s wrong about that”.
You are completely wrong. He is a genuine truther.
I have read many of his articles. He is right about statins but he is wrong about the cause of heart disease. He is also wrong about covid. I am not at all surprised that you “follow” people who are wrong about important issues because you are also wrong on these issues. You might have noticed that many of The Expose readers are awake and can see through your games.
Hi Garth, Sam is one of our resident trolls. Take his abrasive “I know everything and no one knows more than me” bravado with a pinch of salt.
You regard anyone who disagrees with you as a “troll”. You don’t seem to mind when people like Garth insult people on a regular basis. He was accusing everyone of being a “globalist” recently and you didn’t mind that at all because it suited your false narrative.
I don’t believe I accused anyone of “being” a Globalist. I recall asking them if they were Globalists and that was merely a figure of speech, sort of hyperbole or rhetoric, used to point out their hypocrisy. I don’t recall which article it was, but I believe they were they were accusing the author of being a Globalist and yet they were saying things that could have been said by a Globalist.
The article in question was about the “no virus” people being part of the globalist agenda for reasons that make no sense at all. You vociferously supported that agenda. The only hypocrisy involved was coming from you not from people posting the truth.
I’ll tell you who are controlled opposition – those who keep saying that viruses don’t exist.
They do it let the scientists get away with their crimes. If viruses don’t exist, then there can not have been gain of function research.
“I didn’t carry out any gain of function research.”
“Their hypocrisy”?
You repeatedly asked several commenters “are you a globalist”. (emphasis mine).
A pretty well loaded question if you don’t mind me asking-why would you ask such a question? I can only conclude it was because their comments didn’t fit with your worldview. Agreed?
I happen to agree with pretty much nearly everything that Sam has to say regarding the ‘science’.
I also believe Rhoda has a (what shall we say) a near impossible job separating the wheat from the chaff (truth from lies).
IMHO, I believe you have previously posted under other names- this clearly comes through your wring style.
Writing style-I’m getting old!
If you were promoting the “no viruses” theory, then I was attacking that theory. See my other posts on this article with the laughing Fauci. To me, those who say there are no viruses are trying to let him off the hook.
“A genuine truther”?
As for me, I wouldn’t be so presumptuous as to label myself under such a highly laudable banner.
Let God be true, but every man a liar. Romans 3:4.
The other thing requiring massive advance planning and preparation is all the 5G towers that were so rapidly erected during the lockdown. They were all manufactured and ready to go. It must have taken years.
We called it a “plandemic” in the beginning because that is exactly what it was, and it was all “planned” more than 10 years in advance, together with all of the flu pandemic exercises since 2010 and as indicated in such publications as the 2010 one by the Rockerfeller Foundation with the scenario to help usher in the UN Agendas of deliberately causing coronavirus pandemic for top-down “lockstep” controls and lockdowns. As a senior and almost retired professional who has spent a lifetime in analyzing medical and scientific facts, as well as having my fair share of fraud cases, and a wife who is a medical scientist, the badges of fraud were very clear from the beginning regarding these horrendous crimes deliberately perpetrated against us by the top-down order. The discrepancies between Chinese and South Korean media coverage were the first clear signs, and from there everything they did to hype the mortality rates, not just by faking death numbers but by actually withholding effective treatment protocols to kill the relatively few with serious symptoms, were extremely telling. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg in early March 2020 was the first independent and reliable expert to spill the beans, saying that the actual morality numbers did not justify any of the extreme measures. Eventually, in early 2020 it was confirmed that the Covid virus was a lab virus and one which had been isolated some 18 years before in a US military bioweapons facility in Maryland. From there, our sacred top-down lying establishment continued on its lockstep course to destroy its credibility for evermore, and in fact is still pushing on the ignorant masses their highly toxic killer vaccines. No, there is no rehabilitation for them. They remain adverse to the truth and have no real remorse. Neither will restitution do. It is a good case for retribution of the capital kind – and for ALL of the perpetrators.
Can you post the evidence that the “covid virus” was “isolated” please? Hundreds of FOI requests have failed to uncover this evidence but presumably you have?
Hi Fred B, Sam is one of our resident trolls. Take his abrasive “I know everything and no one knows more than me” bravado with a pinch of salt.
The good doctor might look up Dr Mike Yeadon, Dr Judy Mikovits, Dr Meryl Nass, Sacha Latipova and Kathrine Watt for a greater understanding of the conspiracy.
Some very astute comments here.
There wasn’t a “plandemic” there was a scamdemic. Excess deaths during the “first wave” were iatrogenic murders and subsequent excess deaths have been due to the toxic lethal injections. Prof Denis Rancourts excellent epidemiological analysis clearly shows that these deaths were not due to a single pathogen spreading from person to person. Supposed “pathogens” do not wait for lockdowns to start killing people.
There is no “Covid virus”. Ivervectin cannot possibly “have some benefit in Sars-Cov2” because that virus does not exist. That is not to say that ivermectin does not benefit some people because it is effective against some parasites which is a massively underdiagnosed problem in the West. Ivermectin does have some serious side effects which include neurological and fertility problems (sound familiar?).
If Dr Kendrick had really “been looking at the anti-viral properties of Ivermectin for a long time” he would have discovered that there are no viruses. Instead he has just blindly trusted what virologists claim to be true rather than scrutinising their pseudoscientific fraudulent methods. “Those of us, who actually look at research” know that virology is a scam. Unfortunately Dr Kendrick hasn’t bothered to look at the research closely enough.
Those of you who have watched Dr Kendricks videos will know that he himself is “a teensy-weensy bit on the patronising side”. He claims to have done all the research which he simplifies for you because your silly little peasant brains could not possibly understand otherwise. He is the Dunning-Kruger effect personified.
Dr Kendrick believes that there wasn’t “a great conspiracy” because “nothing could be that well planned or organised” because “people are generally pretty useless at such things” and “the motivations behind (most) of those in charge were benign, if paternalistic”. This reveals a breathtaking level of ignorance about how the world really works. I don’t think i need to elaborate on this point to the (mostly) awake readers of The Expose.
“The virus” is not “spread through droplets” because the virus does not exist at all so instead of lookin up “ferrets” look up the virus challenge. The challenge is open to anyone (including Dr Kendrick) who can provide the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists. Should be really easy right? So far no takers!
Dr Kendrick is himself talking “utter scientific bollocks, or direct misinformation, or just plain lies”. We certainly were “clearly lied to, many times”…there is no SARS-CoV-2, Covid-19 is a misdiagnosis not a new and novel disease, and there was no pandemic.
There are “many who claim there was no virus at all” and we claim that because we have studied the details of the fraudulent methods that virologist use. Dr Kendrick has not bothered himself with such details. It is completely disingenuous of him to say that we believe “the deaths were just made up” and that the deaths were not caused by the “very actions designed to save people”. They were iatrogenic murders. FACT. Maybe Dr Kendrick helped out in that regard? I don’t know but he is certainly talking “utter scientific bollocks”.
I’m glad you’ve wasted your time on that rant because it proves me right when, in reply to your earlier post, I said “You have cherry-picked a couple of sentences to make a false accusation against him and you have ignored a lot of what he said in order to misrepresent his article.”
His article is abut things that happened in 2020 and 2021 such as the lockdown, the lying fact checkers, the lies they told about Ivermectin, the fraudulent re-labeling of PPE, the threatening letters from the GMC and other evidence of oppression and tyranny.
Get that, his point was the lies they told about Ivermectin and not about Ivermectin itself.
By going so far off-topic from the things he writes about, you have shown that you merely have some crazed agenda to ram your opinions down people’s throats. If I had a mad obsession like that I’d be very worried.
What happened in 2020 and 2021 is that they faked a pandemic. Neither you nor Dr Kendrick seem to get that. If people don’t get it then they will do it again. Its not a “crazed obsession” to try and tell everyone the truth and to stop it happening again. You are not helping.
Now you are attacking me for things I didn’t say.
I know it wasn’t a genuine emergency, it WAS a Plandemic. I said that when I read Dr. Kendrick saying he doubted that it was planned I thought “He’ wrong about that”.
Due to your mad obsession you are detached from reality. All you want to do it ram the “no viruses” theory down people’s throats.
“I didn’t carry out any gain of function research.”
I’ll tell you who are controlled opposition – those who keep saying that viruses don’t exist.
They do it let the scientists get away with their crimes. If viruses don’t exist, then there can not have been gain of function research.
“I didn’t carry out any gain of function research.”
He’s being too generous. I concentrate more on all the overnight billionaires.
Follow The Money.
Why do so many believe Covid was a plandemic?
Because it was.
In the land down under (Kangorrolandia) AHPRA the health and medical regulators and arbiters of anything health had sent us health care professionals SMS that we were in no undetermined fashion yo speak negatively against the therapeutics and the lockdowns or g-string mandates (facemasks) that we could face instant deregistration and fined.
Post Scriptum: Hitler and Mussolini were boyscouts compared to the people who did the scamdemic and enforced medical fascism on their populace.
Docius in Fondo: The PTB are still in denial
Also I have been pushing for some legal beagle to have the gumption to take matters into hyper drive against the PTB> Its called fraud. *SAFE AND EFFECTIVE. In Roman Civil Law theres the Cicerone precedent . IN Modern day Anglo civil law its fraud to state something as a certainty and then push that product be it therapeutic widget and then it does not meet the so called standard of the time. Hence Safe and effective nd the sating that it had any percentage of therapeutic value when to this day there are no studies that profess the benefits of such a therapeutic. Meanwhile their are an abundance in scientific papers that show the exact opposite.
Here is another one of the Overton window that have occurred post or during pandemic. Any Therapeutics created for animals or humans once marketed for consumption. If any fatalities or injuries were being noted hence 20 to 1000 , the product would instantly taken of the shelf one exception that comes to mind the VIOX and mRNA and adenovirus(Astra Zeneca or Sputnik V whic r the same.
More disturbing is that these products r still in existence and being marketed , It baffles the mind.
I can go on in the 80s there was a health alert on Benzo diazepims . Most studies always allowing for the Overton window were suggesting they should be taken of the shelf. What happened in the next ten years voila Midazolam is introduced into the health care scene. 2010 allowing always 4 the Overton window . Stantins are not good. The the Overton window changed and Stantins are still being pushed. Oxycodone synthetic narcotic being sold as a non addictive therapeutic. Hence during the presedency of Hope Obomber in chief . Heres another one Fentanyl synthetic narcotic .
CUI PODESTA AND FOLLOW THE MONEY FOR WE ARE CHATTEL AND MEAR PEASNTS.
“Pandemic Psy-Op: How COVID-19 Lockdowns Rewired Our Brains”
https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/pandemic-psy-op-covid-19-rewired/