Earlier this month, an employment tribunal judge ruled that “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected in the UK under the Equality Act. The case centres on Twitter posts made by Patrick Lee. The case is ongoing and so Lee has not won his case outright yet, but it is an important victory for free speech.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
During a four-year-long disciplinary process, the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries (“IFoA”) found Patrick Lee guilty of posting offensive or inflammatory tweets about Islam. The IFoA banned Lee from the professional body and ordered him to pay nearly £23,000 in costs.
However, an employment tribunal judge has ruled that Lee’s “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010.
Commenting on the Judge’s ruling, Toby Young of Free Speech Union said, “Congratulations to Patrick Lee and his legal team. By persuading Employment tribunal judge David Khan that Patrick Lee’s ‘Islam-critical’ beliefs are protected under the Equality Act, they have won an important victory for free speech.
“After this judgment, how can the Government hope to prohibit ‘Islamophobia’ or ‘anti-Muslim hatred’?”
“Admittedly, he has not yet won outright. In the next stage of the case – which the Free Speech Union is funding – the tribunal will have to decide whether Lee’s manifestation of his protected ‘Islam-critical’ beliefs, i.e. the tweets in which he expressed them, was appropriate. But the judge in the first stage has indicated he thinks they were.
“Another reason for hesitating before declaring victory is that judgments in the employment tribunal do not set binding legal precedents.”
Read more: Right to criticise Islam is protected under British law, judge rules, The Telegraph, 8 November 2025
Introducing its article about the ruling on Monday, the Free Speech Union tweeted:
An employment tribunal judge has ruled that the right to criticise Islam is protected under the Equality Act 2010.
This is a rare glimpse of common sense – but it also reinforces the argument that, whenever the law is confronted with cases involving criticism of Islam, it struggles.
Patrick Lee was expelled from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries after a four-year disciplinary process and was ordered to pay nearly £23,000 in costs.
The IFoA found that dozens of his posts about Islam on X were “offensive or inflammatory,” with many allegedly intended to “demean or insult Muslims.”
While some Muslims may have found his comments offensive, there are – for now – no blasphemy laws in the UK.
Mr. Lee faces a final hearing in February to determine whether his posts constitute a lawful expression of the protected belief that religions, including Islam, can be openly criticised.
You can read Free Speech Union’s article HERE.
Featured image: Patrick Lee has endured a five-year ordeal as a result of the sanction from the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Source: The Telegraph
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
I surely hope that common sense and free speech can claim victory in this case and in many others.
Free speech that questions or criticises, whether it is focussed on the governments of countries, or the so-called consensus of scientific opinion, or any religious dogma, as well as the opinions of experts (- especially if the expert was paid handsomely by a vested interest to deliver the stated opinion) should be protected for the sake of humanity’s evolvement into a more intelligent race.
Nobody should be silenced, vilified or marginalised for questioning the status quo, or stated history of anything, or for exposing the conflicting actions of self-declared philanthropists and charitable, religious, medical, legal or environmental institutions. In fact all institutions claiming to inform and educate, or declare themselves keepers of moral superiority, should be under scrutiny; scrutiny that is not censored, abused, shut down, or instantly declared to be a denial, a conspiracy, or a racial attack.
Instead, what we have witnessed in our society recently is a creeping censorious malevolence, that punishes by media and attempts to justify detrimental labelling and name calling for supposed crimes against current doctrine.
True and all encompassing freedom of speech should include the right to question and criticise the institutions and governments of UK, Canada, America, France, Poland, Germany, Turkey, China, Brazil and Israel, as much as any other government or organisation in the world.
Free speech should not be only for some, but not for others, otherwise we a stuck as a human race, held back by deceit, and controlled by fear.
[…] Right to criticise Islam is protected under the Equality Act, UK judge rules Earlier this month, an employment tribunal judge ruled that “Islam-critical” beliefs are protected in the UK under the Equality Act. The case centres on Twitter posts made by Patrick Lee. The case is ongoing and so Lee has not won his case outright yet, but it is an important victory for free speech. […]
If you don’t fight for your UK you wont have one, it will be a Muslim shit hole like all shitholes