On 9 April, the Amsterdam Court of Appeals rejected 3 applicants’ appeal to allow provisional evidence hearings regarding the covid project to go ahead. What are they so afraid of?
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
At the end of March, we published an update on whether a provisional evidence proceedings, whether testimonies from Michael Yeadon, Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt, Catherine Austin Fitts and Joseph Sansone about the covid “pandemic” will be allowed to be heard before a Dutch judge.
In March 2025, three petitioners filed a request to hear evidence from nominated experts under oath before a judge. The petitioners are considering making a claim against 17 defendants regarding the “Covid-19 Project: The Great Reset.” The evidence would help the three petitioners decide whether they should move forward with a case against the 17 defendants, including Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, Mark Rutte, the Dutch state and Dutch state media.
The Amsterdam Court of Appeals said its decision would be handed down on 9 April 2026, which the court has done. You can read the court’s order HERE.
On 9 April, Peter Stassen, who is representing the three petitioners, issued a press statement. “Today, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal delivered its ruling … The Amsterdam Court ruled that the appeal is inadmissible.” In other words, the provisional evidence proceedings cannot go ahead.
This is not the end of the road in seeking accountability from the 17 defendants in a Dutch court. The same 17 defendants are the subject of an ongoing case filed in July 2023 by 7 plaintiffs, who are also represented by Peter Stassen after the lead attorney, Arno van Kessel, was jailed under spurious grounds.
The following is Stassen’s press release of 9 April.
Press Release 9 April 2026
Following the ruling of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal dated 9 April 2026 (Case number: 200.360.223/01) regarding the appeal against the rejection by the Leeuwarden District Court dated 20 August 2025 (Case number: C/17/199273 / HA RK 25-17) to hear Mike Yeadon, Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Katherine Watt and Joseph Sansone by way of preliminary evidentiary proceedings regarding the true nature of the covid-19 injections in the project ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’.
Today, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal delivered its ruling. In that ruling, the Amsterdam Court ruled exclusively on the admissibility of the appeal. The Amsterdam Court ruled that the appeal is inadmissible because there is allegedly no ground for breaking the judgment. It is thus the judgment of the Amsterdam Court that the District Court in Leeuwarden did not violate any fundamental standards in the first instance.
Nevertheless, this appeal case concerning the admission of experts constitutes a legal marker for the separate proceedings on the merits in the court of Leeuwarden (Case number: C/17/190788 / HA ZA 23/172) in which the same parties have been sued. The declaratory judgment sought in the proceedings on the merits pertains to the period leading up to the rendering of the final judgment in that case. This appeal has removed any possible misunderstanding regarding the continued unlawful conduct of the defendants.
While the core of the requested and presented expert evidence indicates clearly that the covid-19 injections is a bioweapon or indistinguishable to a bioweapon, the defendants have falsely clung to a false official narrative of, among others, “a safe and effective vaccine” that has nothing to do with the truth. The defendants have, because of this attitude, in this appeal again clearly shown their obedience to the official covid-19 narrative, which is a condition for being an executor of the Covid-19 Great Reset project. The court in Leeuwarden has a big historical responsibility to deal with this in the right way, in which context the planned hearing in the proceedings on the merits in the court of Leeuwarden is of great importance.
The proceedings in the merits will have a five hours oral hearing that takes place on 22 October 2026 from 12:30 to 17:30. The court in Leeuwarden is informed that the proposed experts will be in court on behalf of my clients. This is a procedural right of my clients embedded in procedural Law. New evidence is allowed until four weeks before the court hearing and more conclusive evidence will be presented.
The clients and myself a very grateful for all the offered help, information and kind words we received.
Peter Stassen
Why Do They Not Want Evidence To Be Heard?
Fiona Rose Diamond interviewed Stassen after the Amsterdam Court of Appeals hearing on 9 March. In the hearing, Stassen managed to mention a lot about the agenda humanity is facing.
“We can prove without any doubt that this official narrative of CO 19 is fake and the things are going so quick now. We also mentioned the Epstein files which shows that there is a very evil elite led by bankers really evil to this world and to all the people living here,” he said.
He left the judges with a thought: That they must decide who are the children of God and who are the children of the devil.
“It needs to be told in that way,” Diamond said. “It’s [Stassens court statements] unlike anything I’ve ever seen.”
In her report, Diamond played some clips from the experts that the petitioners requested the Court of Appeals to hear, as well as the hearing itself.
After watching the video below, it will become evident why courts do not want evidence to be heard in front of a judge.
You can watch a 1 hour 30 minute auto dubbed version of the March 2026 hearing at the Amsterdam Court of Appeals on Stichting Recht Oprecht’s YouTube channel HERE.
Related: For the First Time Ever, the Covid Jabs Are Called “Bioweapons” in Court! What Was Called “Conspiracy” Is Now Evidence In Court! AMG News, updated 29 April 2026
Featured image: Peter Stassen, attorney representing plaintiffs in Dutch case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla et al.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
But that’s to be expected… they are part of the club and paid very well.
It’s a very big club. Thanks to the grace and guidance of God, we’ve chosen not to join it.
“the lead attorney, Arno van Kessel, was jailed under spurious grounds”
Covid was about mass murder. The murder of one at a time would be even less of a challenge to the murderers, but it could also draw more direct attention to them as individuals. So they ruin lives in more indirect ways.
I am grateful for the courageous people who have long stood up against the murderers and for humanity and won’t give up. I’m glad they name names, even though the likes of Bill Gates might feel a tweak of pride every time he sees his in print.
These bastards will never be held accountable in this world, but eternity is a very long time.
Hi Barb N, how do you measure “accountable in this world”? If you only think courts of law presided over by men/women can hold people accountable, then you could be right. But shame, particularly public shame, is far more potent a punishment than being incarcerated in a jail. Bill Gates et al have brought shame on themselves, their families, their children and their children’s children. Because we will not forget and we will tell our children.
In addition to that, they may have condemned not only themselves but possibly their descendants too: “[They] shall not enter the assembly of the LORD; even to the tenth generation none of [their] descendants shall enter the assembly of the LORD forever.” Deuteronomy 23:3 (and an interpretation of the verse HERE.)
Natural Law (i.e. God’s Law) trumps all man-made laws, statutes and regulations.
They can’t move around freely in public either. Where is Matt Hancock for instance? I don’t fancy his chances if he ever shows his face…
Having had prolongued experience in NL law – using tort to freeze assets of various nefarious orginisations – not only one – the presentation of xperts is an oblique obsfcuration of the agency behind patent 7279327 ,backdated from 19 sept 2018 to 19 april 2002 .DARPA ,pfizer can be shown to have modulated a relatively harmless canine S1 protein from 1998 .This became sars1 in 2001 .
Moore et al 2004 shows sars1 aerosolised is sarscov2 – from 2004 .
The tort begins not with the present day claimaints – but the fact Ron Fouchier was aerosolising sars1 from 2000 to 2010 ,latter date of which RF’s Bloomberg interview confirms .
obsfcuration
Couple of typos.
Keep up the good work.
Have you a link to the Bloomberg article?
Nope .Do your own homework .
2 BSL3+ ‘s within 60kms of each other ,Wagening to Oostvaarders Plassen where a more qualified student than you ,became patient zero aerosolised mink sars 1 .
Moore et al 2004 you of course ignore .
Get off ukr high stool
I hope these 7 petitioners keep at it. Should be taking place in courts across the world. And the defendants should be increased to all the the bureaucrats, lawyers, hospitals and physicians who went along with and played their part in this crime against humanity that far outstrips what the Nazis did.
When adressing dutch delegitimisation – Shell’s hidden juristic/fiscal/banking tactic – I personally like to mention the ‘Van Traa Report’ ,wherin EVERY 11th impounded container is ,and remains permantly invisible to the dutch goverment ,over 5 decades – ‘provision ‘ ostensibly for undercovers via local canton wedhouder ,a farce beyond imagination . .Meaning a traditionalisation of intl ‘drug lines’ , so that some permanency can be given them ,in spite of a container being sold 3 times while in transit ,often between Edinboro & Norway -to name but one trick .
Major General Ian Watson ,head of signals interceptions mid 90s to mid oughties, North Irland -Amsterdam -Berlin listened to every associated IRA source for drugs + .While posing as a domine in a church in A’dam recouperating from a close shave in 1996 Mancherster that left him limping particularly badly .’Subsequently’ –
UK govt demanded formalisation of everyNL payoff between wedhouders’ contingency on drug lords ,however ‘separated’ from C4 shipments ‘offcially’ .
Anyone who dared to attempt Van Traa formalisation (from the dutch side) -since 1998 -‘had a fatal accident’ .
The last to attempt suchlike was Peter de Vries – de rijdende rechter .
6 bullets to back of head neck etc – valiantly fought for 10 days before succumbing .
So while law is failing terminally BEHIND an incomplete Van Traa within dutch second chamber – foreigeiners whine about a test case tort ,with imported loud mouth ‘personal expertise’ .
Better to focus on NL’s fatal weak point –
link between offshoring from USA to Oostvaarders of pfizers S1 1998 RICOH .
Via its inception – labs funded by ‘Van Traa’ failures .
A name ,just one
Tsjoerd Van Der Zwaan
Time for yanks to do their less imported homework .
https://www.brighteon.com/8432adbf-12d7-4840-851f-177d889b139f