“Death by doctor” is going global – it is not painless, peaceful or dignified as campaigners claim.
Despite the lies told by its supporters, “doctor-assisted dying” is frequently painful and distressing for patients and relatives.
In the UK, the dangerous bill that would have given doctors a licence to kill rather than doing all they can to save patients’ lives has been defeated in Parliament for a fifth time.
“The one certainty is that a small number of people pushing this deadly legislation … will be back for yet another attempt at pushing through legislation which will, I believe, eventually result in the disabled, the mentally ill and the poor being killed as part of the global depopulation plan which is part of the Great Reset,” Dr. Vernon Coleman writes.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Table of Contents
- The State of Things
- Look at Canada – Now One of the World’s Leading Centres of Murder By Doctor
- Here’s How It Works
- Here’s a Little Challenge for Anyone Promoting a Death-By-Doctor Legislation
- People Who Promote Death By Doctor Schemes Always Lie
- Euthanasia Campaigners Have Lower Moral Values Than the Nazi Party
- Why Are They Pushing Death-By-Doctor Programmes?
- About the Author
The State of Things
The approved mass slaughter of the disabled, the poor, the frail, the old, the unemployed and the unwanted is, with quiet certainty and to the eternal shame of politicians, becoming global. It is part of the Great Reset and it is an essential part of the depopulation programme.
They call it doctor-assisted suicide, and it’s already available in a number of countries (notably and with most seemingly uncensored enthusiasm in Canada and Holland) – but the concept of death by doctor is spreading fast, and like everything else bad that is happening, it is global. Opposing this sinister, contemptible and malevolent new movement is one of the most difficult challenges we face in the years ahead.
Voluntary euthanasia, aka assisted dying, aka “death by doctor,” really began in earnest in Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg at the start of the 21st century. (Switzerland has allowed assisted suicide since 1942, but only in a vague sort of way in that helping someone kill themselves is legal if the person helping does not have selfish motives.)
After Belgium and Holland allowed death by doctor, there was a hiatus of several years and then came a sudden and seemingly inexplicable explosion in the number of countries succumbing to pressure and introducing similar schemes of their own. (The explosion was inexplicable only to those who do not realise that “death by doctor” is an essential part of the Great Reset.)
Euthanasia was legalised in Canada in 2016. In Spain in 2021, Austria in 2022, in Portugal in 2023, in Colombia in 2022, in Cuba in 2023, in Ecuador in 2024, in Australia in 2025, in New Zealand in 2021, in Jersey in 2026, in Uruguay in 2025, in France in 2026 and in recent years in 13 states in the USA. Legislation is being drafted in Germany and Italy.
In Britain, the pro-euthanasia supporters have for years been pushing hard for new legislation in Britain – for legislation which would undoubtedly legalise the mass murder of the weak and the innocent.
The supporters of “doctor-assisted dying” bills have repeatedly tried to push their lethal legislation through the British Parliamentary System. And each time wise, humane heads have ensured that they have failed. (Curiously, although the most recent two attempts received massive help from the Labour Government, the Labour leaders, knowing that patients prefer their doctors to try to keep them alive rather than to kill them, never had the courage to promote the death-by-doctor bills as official government Bills but preferred the proposed legislation to be presented by backbenchers and then given quiet support in an unsuccessful attempt to ensure it was passed.)
The latest “legalised euthanasia bill,” surely one of the most badly conceived, misleading and dangerous pieces of legislation ever introduced into the British Parliament, was, in September 2026, yet again rejected.
The one certainty is that a small number of people pushing this deadly legislation (more than a few of them professionals, employed to promote “assisted dying”) will be back for yet another attempt at pushing through legislation which will, I believe, eventually result in the disabled, the mentally ill and the poor being killed as part of the global depopulation plan which is part of the Great Reset.
This is already happening around the world. And when similar legislation suddenly appears all around the world, and a clear pattern has emerged, I find myself being suspicious about the motives of those promoting the Great Reset.
When politicians or the public reject “death by doctor” legislation, they are told to vote again. And again. And again. And again. Normally once would be enough. Politicians don’t usually bring back legislation which has been rejected once, let alone five times.
Five times in recent years there have been attempts to introduce “death by doctor” laws into the UK. And five times the attempts have failed.
But the promoters of “death by doctor” bills will try again, despite the fact that the idea of allowing doctors to kill patients is unpopular both with doctors and with patients. No one wants this damned legislation except a few insane fanatics working towards the Great Reset and global depopulation.
“Death by doctor” bills are, like those monsters which used to scare children in the 1960s, never allowed to crawl away into a corner and die quietly. “Death by doctor” bills will always be back because euthanasia (or whatever the politicians choose to call it) is part of the Great Reset.
Every time one of these bills gets rejected, there is another vote, and another vote – in the same way that voters who choose the “wrong” answer at the ballot box are, these days, asked to try again until they get it right (particularly if the vote affects the European Union in any way).
The supporters of this dangerous legislation, which will allow doctors to kill patients who have been convinced that death is their only answer, will say that they will only offer euthanasia to a small number of patients who are in terrible pain and who are desperate to die.
And some naïve and ignorant campaigners may think that’s what will happen.
But in every country where doctor-assisted suicide has been made legal, the rules about who can be killed have been quickly changed – with the parameters being extended and the original restrictions brushed aside.
What starts out as an apparently well-meant service for the few quickly becomes nothing less than the mass murder of people who are regarded by the conspirators and their slaves as a useless drain on society.
Look at Canada – Now One of the World’s Leading Centres of Murder By Doctor
When the Canadians first made death by doctor legal in 2016, there were all sorts of restrictions on who could be accepted for the “death by doctor” scheme.
The powers that should not be speedily got rid of the restrictions, which were considered a nuisance, and today more than one in every 20 deaths in Canada is a death by doctor killing. In some areas of Canada, the number of deaths officially registered as “death by doctor” is around 8% [which is 1 in 12].
In 2024, 16,499 people were deliberately killed by doctors though the actual figure is much higher than this because the official Canadian statistics and some provinces don’t count the deliberate killing of patients by doctors as a cause of death. Instead, they put down the underlying condition which was used an excuse for the killing. Death by doctor is already one of (if not the) biggest cause of death in Canada. It is certainly the biggest cause of death among those dismissed so airily by the conspirators as the “useless eaters.”
This, of course, is the reverse of the trick they used to boost up the number of people dying from covid. Everyone who had a positive PCR test (generally agreed to be the most random and entirely useless medical test in history) was put down as having died of covid even if they were run over by a bus or bludgeoned to death by a madman. In Canada, to keep the totals down (and remember that in 2024 the official figure for death by doctor was 16,499) they put you down as having died of asthma or toothache – even if you died with a doctor pumping a syringe full of poison into a vein.
The Canadian death by doctor programme began in 2016 and the legislation then required that death be reasonably foreseeable. (That’s what you get when lawyers become involved. Surely everyone’s death is reasonably foreseeable? We all die eventually. Even the conspirators.)
By 2025, there had been 60,301 official deaths by doctor but the real figure is much higher.
In 2021, just five years after the launch of death by doctor, Canadians started killing people who didn’t just have a reasonably foreseeable death but did have what they called a “grievous and incurable medical condition.” The lawyers got involved and death by doctor was made available to anyone with a serious illness or an incurable disease.
So in Canada they’ll kill you if you have diabetes or heart disease or are disabled. Or if you feel you have lost your independence. The poor or lonely are especially likely to be killed. Canadians are being coerced by doctors into choosing to end their lives. Many of those killed in Canada are young and in good health. One patient was approved for “death by doctor” because of hearing loss.
Dr. Jack King’s book entitled ‘They want to kill us – here’s how and why’ is the world’s number one bestselling book on euthanasia and doctor assisted killing. In his book Dr. King details horrifying incidents of patients being encouraged to consider death as an alternative solution to their health, social or financial problems.
When Canada’s “death by doctor” scheme was introduced in 2016, fears were raised that vulnerable groups could be targeted.
That didn’t last long.
I find it scarcely believable but the criteria for “death by doctor” in Canada was revised after the country’s Supreme Court ruled that the previous law which excluded people with disabilities from the death by doctor scheme was unconstitutional. You can always rely on the lawyers and the judges to do the wrong thing, can’t you?
The really alarming thing is that 73% of Canadians approve of the way “death by doctor” is being managed. Just 16% of Canadians oppose it. An astonishing 27% of Canadians believe that Medical Assistance in Dying (“MAiD”) should be expanded to include people who aren’t ill but who are poor. And 28% of Canadians would offer “death by doctor” to the homeless. Just 20% would offer MAiD to anyone for any reason. Over half of Canadians said that people who couldn’t receive the treatment they needed (for financial or other reasons) should be offered “death by doctor.”
In theory, death by doctor is supposed to be offered only to people whose problems are incurable. But who knows what is incurable and what isn’t? A cure may be just around the corner. The patient’s problem may disappear without treatment (as many health problems do). The diagnosis might be wrong (as diagnoses often are). The doctor may not be aware that a cure is available. An available cure may be deemed too expensive.
In March 2027, Canada will start killing people who are mentally ill. And they’ll be killing children too. One pressure group has already produced a booklet entitled the ‘Children’s Activity Book for Assisted Dying’.
Remember: over a quarter of Canadians want “death by doctor” to be offered to the homeless.
Actually, allowing doctors to kill the depressed and the anxious isn’t really necessary because they have, you will not be surprised to hear, found a way round the inconvenient law which (until 2027) protects the mentally ill from death by doctor.
Doctors will use any physical ailment as an excuse to sign the patient up for “death by doctor”: arthritis, asthma, eczema, menopausal problems – anything will do. If things are slow, they’ll probably sign you up for indigestion or dandruff.
Here’s How It Works
A woman pops along to see her doctor and regales him with another instalment of her life story. Her husband is out of work, the washing machine has broken and she struggles to make ends meet.
“I’m sorry to hear this,” says her doctor smarmily. “Would you like some more pills or would you rather die? We have a special offer on death by doctor this week?”
“Oh, well, I’ll give the death by doctor a try,” says the woman, thinking that she can always go back to the pills if it doesn’t work.
“Fine,” says the doctor. “I can’t give you death by doctor for your depression until 2027, but you have a bad knee, don’t you?”
“Oh yes, doctor. It gives me terrible gip if I have to run for a bus in cold weather.”
“That’s fine then,” says her doctor. “We can use your bad knee as your ticket to the death by doctor scheme. Is Thursday convenient?”
“Thursday would be fine.”
“Wonderful. There’s no need to bring a suitcase or any spare clothes, and no need to tell anyone where you’re going, but if you have a nice urn you’re not using, bring that with you. We’ll ring your husband and let him know what’s happened. He can pick you up. In one of our lovely urns.”
And that’s the merry end of that.
You probably won’t be surprised to hear that the same thing is happening in the other countries. In Holland, a healthy 17-year-old with mental health problems was killed.
(It’s worth noting, by the way, that nine out of ten people who attempt suicide and fail are happy that they failed – they rediscover their joy of living.)
Researchers found that many patients who were killed were autistic or had learning difficulties. In Belgium, parental consent is required for children under 15 years of age. In California, there is pressure to kill anyone with dementia.
Here’s a Little Challenge for Anyone Promoting a Death-By-Doctor Legislation
I bet you £10,000 that within five years your “death by doctor” bill will have been changed and your “death by doctor” scheme will be available for more people than was promised in your original bill.
It’s a fair bet that the mentally ill, the elderly and the disabled will be killed. And the poor and the very young.
That’s what has happened everywhere else. Why should Britain be different?
People Who Promote Death By Doctor Schemes Always Lie
Like politicians, estate agents and vaccine salesmen, the people who promote death by doctor schemes always lie about what they’re offering.
It is, for example, a convenient myth (convenient for the proponents of euthanasia) that doctor-assisted suicide (also known as euthanasia) is painless and dignified. Oh dear, is that a whopper. It’s up there with “this won’t hurt a bit,” “if you move here you’ll find the neighbours are lovely,” “the cheque is in the post” and “these tax rises are for your benefit.”
There is plenty of evidence to show that death by doctor is neither painless nor dignified.
Euthanasia does not provide the painless, peaceful death which its advocates claim it to be. The problem is that apart from shooting them with Dirty Harry’s Magnum, there is no perfect way for the government to kill people.
There are no standardised methods for euthanasia and so, as a result, there are frequent cases of prolonged and distressing deaths. There appears to be a high incidence of vomiting, re-awakening from coma and prolongation of the dying process (with some people taking up to seven days to die). Mixing concoctions of drugs has led to traumatic deaths.
There is considerable confusion about what to do if an initial attempt at euthanasia fails. Should the patient be told that they have to give their consent a second time? Or a third time? What should be done if a patient is semi-conscious and has not died? Should they then be kept alive?
A study performed in the Netherlands showed that in 21 of 114 cases, the patient did not die as soon as expected or woke up, and the doctor had to “kill” them for a second time.
What happens if the doctor or nurse who is performing the euthanasia has left the building – which is likely to happen if a death takes a number of days?
What happens if a doctor or nurse cannot put an intravenous (“IV”) line into a vein? (This is something which often happens with patients whose veins may be frail or damaged.)
The same drugs which are used for killing prisoners on death row are sometimes used to kill patients who have consented to euthanasia. But there is evidence that the killing of prisoners does not always go smoothly and can take longer than might be expected. (Lethal injections were introduced as more humane than the gas chamber or the electric chair. There is no evidence that they are more humane.)
One of the drugs used in the authorised killing of patients is propofol, which can sting as it flows through a vein when given in normal doses. No one knows what effect it has when given in large doses in euthanasia. Experts fear that death by euthanasia could feel like drowning. If paralysing drugs are used, the patient appears calm, peaceful and quiet – but that doesn’t tell us what the patient is experiencing.
When killing drugs are given orally, the death can take up to ten hours. If a doctor or nurse is not available with an IV kit ready, the distress to patients and relatives can be considerable.
Monitors are not used when a patient is being killed. This means that there is no evidence about what is happening, and death can only be certified by a doctor or nurse feeling for a pulse. No attempts are made to monitor brain or cardiac response.
Autopsies of executed American prisoners show the accumulation of fluid in the lungs. This is very distressing, for the patient is effectively drowning in their own secretions.
Experts fear that patients being killed may suffer intolerable, unbearable physical or psychological pain.
In Belgium, the relatives of a 36-year-old woman heard screams when she was supposedly being euthanised. A post-mortem showed that the woman had been suffocated with a pillow after the drugs failed to kill her.
An elderly, demented woman in Belgium was euthanised after her family decided that she should be killed. Since it was claimed that the woman didn’t understand what was happening, the doctor laced her coffee with sedatives – while she was chatting with her family. The doctor then gave another sedative by injection. The woman then stood up. Family members held her down while the doctor injected her and killed her. In court later, the judges declared that “given the deeply demented condition of the patient, the doctor did not need to verify her wish for euthanasia.”
A gunshot would be quicker and probably more painless than drugs.
Why don’t advocates of euthanasia be blunt and endorse the idea that doctors should simply shoot patients? Patients could, like Nurse Edith Cavell, be put on a chair and shot in a scruffy courtyard. It would be faster and more certain than any other way of killing. A firing squad could be made up of euthanasia campaigners and politicians.
In more than half of the cases where people in Oregon, USA, were subjected to euthanasia, there is no record of whether or not there were any complications. I bet there were. Complications which have been recorded during euthanasia include: difficulty in finding a vein, spasms, twitching, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, sweating, gasping. One instance of euthanasia failed because the doctor had ordered the wrong drug. Another attempt was delayed when the doctor had to leave to fetch a second batch of lethal drugs.
Contrary to the reassurances offered by campaigners for “death by doctor” schemes, taking lethal drugs by mouth can be traumatic. It is not unusual for patients to take many hours to die. One patient took 104 hours to die. One patient became unconscious 25 minutes after swallowing lethal medication but woke up and regained consciousness 65 hours later.
One report showed that lethal injections caused severe pain and severe respiratory distress with associated sensations of drowning, asphyxiation, panic and terror in the overwhelming majority of cases.
A study of more than 200 autopsy reports after executions in nine American States showed evidence of pulmonary oedema in the lungs (likely to cause a feeling of drowning or suffocation).
Midazolam used in executions has caused signs of pain – including gasping, choking and coughing, with patients heaving against their restraints.
Evidence shows that some people who choose assisted suicide vomit their lethal dose of drugs before it can be absorbed.
You should not for one second believe the outrageous attempts by the Bill’s supporters to claim the moral high ground. No Parliament passes bills to help people. Politicians have deliberately destroyed our food, our health care, our water, our cities, our towns, our countryside and our national reputations. In my view, anyone who thinks that “death by doctor” bills are promoted and passed to help people is woefully, almost criminally, misguided.
Euthanasia Campaigners Have Lower Moral Values Than the Nazi Party
There is little or no public debate on this issue. Just as there was no debate about covid, about the toxic covid vaccines or about global warming.
The State apparatchiks who refuse to allow proper debate about important issues are working for the conspirators whose very existence is denied as nothing more than nightmares created by so-called conspiracy theorists.
Within a few years of “death by doctor” bills becoming law the clauses which were put there to protect the innocent, the naïve and the unhappy will be removed.
That is what always happens. Just look at Canada if you don’t believe me.
Euthanasia Bills are being passed to help promote depopulation; to help kill the weak and the vulnerable. It’s much cheaper to slaughter the weak and the people the conspirators call the “useless eaters.” A nation can save billions by killing off the sick and the poor and the weak. And, of course, killing the elderly will save billions because pensions won’t have to be paid. During the covid fraud of 2020, the British government actually boasted that killing thousands of old-aged pensioners had saved billions of pounds.
To make their “death by doctor” scheme more attractive, governments are deliberately not providing hospices with proper funding. And powerful painkillers are increasingly unavailable, with doctors refusing to prescribe them because they claim that prescribing drugs endangers the planet. Everywhere you look, the Great Reset is there.
If you think I am exaggerating about what is happening just think about the Liverpool Care Pathway. That was banned, but it is still used. The elderly are denied food and water when doctors and nurses decide to kill them. Dying of thirst and starvation is painful. But that’s what happens to countless thousands of old people every year. The ones who cry out and won’t die fast enough are killed with a kill shot of midazolam and morphine – made popular during the covid lockdowns when doctors and nurses were told that it was open season on killing the elderly. No one has been arrested for the lockdown murders – but thousands of doctors and nurses should have been arrested, charged and imprisoned.
Look at how the use of Do Not Resuscitate (“DNR”) notices has spread.
DNR notices were introduced to ensure that the almost dead were allowed to die peacefully. But today DNR notices are being slapped on the medical records of young people who need surgery or who are mentally ill in some way. Check it out if you don’t believe me.
The elderly and the sick and the disabled don’t matter very much in our society. If you have a uniform of some kind, you can pretty well do what you like with them. If you’re just a thug, then you might get six months in prison if you kill one.
Politicians around the world have declared open season on killing not just the elderly but also the sick, the disabled, the depressed, the poor and the unemployed.
Most doctors disapprove of “death by doctor” legislation. They believe that allowing politicians and the courts into medicine is just plain wrong. Just look at the mess politicians and judges make of everything else.
Remember, Adolf Hitler had a euthanasia programme. He closed it down and abandoned it because he thought it was wrong. It’s something of an eye-opener to know that campaigners for “death by doctor” have lower moral values than the Nazi party.
All countries which currently have euthanasia bills (and please let’s not stop pretending that this isn’t euthanasia – it patently is just that) have the same problems. Good doctors don’t want to be involved with death-by-doctor schemes. There is never any requirement for the doctor or technician doing the killing to have any expertise. How much are doctors going to be paid to kill people they don’t know? How many doctors will do the killing for the money? Will the doctors need therapy afterwards? Or will the NHS just hire psychopaths to do the killing? It is usual for the doctor appointed to do the killing to be allowed to choose the second doctor. And if the second doctor disagrees with what is going on, then the first doctor can sack his appointed “assistant” and choose someone else. The demand for euthanasia will increase as medical care becomes worse and waiting lists get longer – both things which are happening very rapidly. Millions of patients in the UK will die before they receive the treatment they need. Is this being done deliberately to push them into choosing euthanasia? Millions of people are consumed by fear and feel hopeless about the future. Is just killing them the right solution?
There is no requirement for the doctor paid to do the killing to talk to the victim’s general practitioner (“GP”) or consultant. More amazingly, I believe that there is no requirement for the killer doctor to talk to, or even inform, the victim’s family or partners. Relatives will only find out afterwards that their loved one has been killed by the State.
“My son didn’t come home from school today.”
“Oh, no he won’t be coming home. He signed up for the school’s euthanasia programme and so the school caretaker killed him after the geography lesson. He was quite upset because Elspeth Windjammer wouldn’t go out with him and he got a B- for his Media Studies exam paper. You can pick up his body in the school morgue.”
“Why didn’t someone tell me?”
“Oh, the official confidentiality rules mean we can’t tell parents when their children choose to take the euthanasia route.”
Why Are They Pushing Death-By-Doctor Programmes?
Death by doctor Bills are blatantly crude. This is depopulation legislation designed to satisfy the insane conspirators who believe that there are too many people alive – and that the global population must be cut down to 500 million. I can promise you one thing: if you don’t help stop this evil legislation, you will regret your inaction. As they drag you, or a loved one, into the death room, your last words will be: “I should have spoken up when I had the chance.”
Oh, and there is one other reason why the establishment is so keen on euthanasia: it will release a good many organs for use. If people are left to die naturally, their organs will deteriorate and begin to rot but if they are selected at the right time, their organs can be harvested in good condition – as they’re needed. Organ donation started out as optional and voluntary but has become the default position, with citizens having to opt out of giving their organs – possibly while they would like to be still using them.
There is no little irony in the fact that patients being encouraged to die might themselves be saved if they were considered important enough to be treated as organ recipients rather than as organ donors.
Doctors have been told to suggest organ donation as, if not an incentive, kind of “consolation” for the person’s own loss of life.
Since organ transplantation is extremely expensive, and health services are cutting costs, it is inevitable that the organs taken from patients who have been murdered by the State will be reserved for politicians, senior civil servants and billionaires.
Oh, and one other thing: organs can only be extracted and used for transplantation if the donor patient is still alive. You can’t take organs from a dead person who has died in a car crash. But you can take as many organs as you can carry from a euthanasia victim.
And the madness is beyond parody. I am told that in Germany, people aren’t allowed to sign up for death by doctor unless they are fully vaccinated against covid.
From Scotland there is news of plans to amend their death by doctor bill so that anyone who tries to talk someone out of dying will be considered a criminal. Indeed, just trying to influence someone contemplating death by doctor will be a criminal offence. What nice, kind person thought that one up, I wonder.
The whole global death-by-doctor movement is criminal and beyond insane. And the hundreds of people promoting it are beyond evil.
NOTE: Vernon Coleman’s latest book (published on 17th September 2026) is called ‘The Horrors of the Great Reset and Why You Should be Afraid’. You need to read it now – before it is too late.
About the Author
Vernon Coleman, MB ChB DSc, practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books. He has written over 100 books, which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read. Since mid-December 2024, Dr Coleman has also been publishing articles on Substack; you can subscribe to and follow him on Substack HERE.
There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you would like to help finance his work, please consider purchasing a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman available in print on Amazon.
Featured image: Euthanasia campaigners in the UK. Taken from ‘Peers suggest over 900 changes to assisted dying bill’, BBC, 14 November 2025
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Latest News, World News
I would really hate to be the evil people standing before Yeshua on judgement day. I believe these evil people will have some of the greatest punishments in the flames of hell, yes, these evil people will be in the worst torments in the flames of hell fire, they will live along side Hitler, Stalin, Mousilini, and all of the rest. The only thing is they will not be able to see each other because of the heavy black smoke, they will be able to hear the screaming from others torments.